This look about right?

Topics related to wireless broadband antennas
Forum rules
Use the SEARCH function for related topics PRIOR to posting a new topic on the same subject.
Post Reply
backndawoods
Posts: 9
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2021 6:51 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 4 times

This look about right?

Post by backndawoods »

Is this correct or should I have the bottom pair pointing down?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
gscheb
Posts: 1605
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2019 10:37 am
Has thanked: 85 times
Been thanked: 329 times

Re: This look about right?

Post by gscheb »

They should all point the same direction. If that is what you are asking? Not one pair pointed towards the ground. If you feel you are not getting the best performance from it could try adding more distance between the two pairs of antennas.
backndawoods
Posts: 9
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2021 6:51 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: This look about right?

Post by backndawoods »

I'm sorry I meant the little arrows on the antenna pointing down.

Something like this

\__|__/
|
/----\

Basically like an X
backndawoods
Posts: 9
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2021 6:51 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: This look about right?

Post by backndawoods »

Bah. My little artwork got butchered lol
Dr-BroadBand
Posts: 558
Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2020 8:52 am
Location: Texas
Has thanked: 94 times
Been thanked: 118 times

Re: This look about right?

Post by Dr-BroadBand »

How long are your cables?
What type of cable?
What is your Signal strength?
backndawoods
Posts: 9
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2021 6:51 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: This look about right?

Post by backndawoods »

Um the cables that came with em are 30 foot, dont know the type, they're connected to a grounding block, then it goes to 10 foot RG6 to the router.

Getting around -106 to -110 strength. Shows 2 bars on the router.

Keeps steady at 30 35 mbps, but will jump to 45 50 at night. The tower is beside I 85. A few miles away behind heavy pine woods, as the crow flies.
Dr-BroadBand
Posts: 558
Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2020 8:52 am
Location: Texas
Has thanked: 94 times
Been thanked: 118 times

Re: This look about right?

Post by Dr-BroadBand »

Would be better off with LM400 cable.
:ugeek: https://thewirelesshaven.com/shop/cable ... -usa-made/

But you have good speed so maybe good enough. But there is room for improvement with your signal strength

If you share your Single Quality and Signal/Noise ratio numbers we (The Group) could give better advice
backndawoods
Posts: 9
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2021 6:51 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: This look about right?

Post by backndawoods »

Ok I'll post them later tonight or tomorrow, drinkin beer and frying turkeys at the moment 😁
backndawoods
Posts: 9
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2021 6:51 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: This look about right?

Post by backndawoods »

The system numbers
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Dr-BroadBand
Posts: 558
Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2020 8:52 am
Location: Texas
Has thanked: 94 times
Been thanked: 118 times

Re: This look about right?

Post by Dr-BroadBand »

backndawoods wrote: Fri Nov 26, 2021 7:53 pm The system numbers
You have an awesome modem!!
But your signal needs a little work.

For a test would put your modem in the tree with your antenna with very short cables to see if you have signal loss in your cabling.

Per the manual
Minimize RF cable losses to the antenna; the recommended maximum cable loss for antenna
cabling is 0.5 dB.
User avatar
Didneywhorl
Posts: 3646
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 5:37 pm
Location: USA
Has thanked: 1370 times
Been thanked: 764 times
Contact:

Re: This look about right?

Post by Didneywhorl »

Def need netter signal strength and quality
gscheb
Posts: 1605
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2019 10:37 am
Has thanked: 85 times
Been thanked: 329 times

Re: This look about right?

Post by gscheb »

Do you have trees like that in front of the antennas too? Close trees to antennas can be an issue.
backndawoods
Posts: 9
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2021 6:51 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: This look about right?

Post by backndawoods »

Oh yea, theres trees all over. My only option I guess is goin a tower, but I'm not going that route. Starlink says mid 22 for my area so If things stay like they are I can just hold out till then. I'm able to game and stream without buffering so it's all good. I do have an older signal booster I may put in line on primary 1 too see if it does anything, but other than that I'm done.
gscheb
Posts: 1605
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2019 10:37 am
Has thanked: 85 times
Been thanked: 329 times

Re: This look about right?

Post by gscheb »

Trees close to the antenna are the worse. If there is a good distance between antenna and trees usually fine. Sometimes just eliminating a tree or two that are close makes a huge difference. Just sharing info. Glad that it is working for you as is.
User avatar
albert90
Posts: 20
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2022 5:16 am
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 8 times

Re: This look about right?

Post by albert90 »

gscheb wrote: Mon Nov 29, 2021 1:28 pm Trees close to the antenna are the worse. If there is a good distance between antenna and trees usually fine. Sometimes just eliminating a tree or two that are close makes a huge difference. Just sharing info. Glad that it is working for you as is.
Seriously though, it makes a lot of difference. Was running into similar issues in the past turned out it was the trees! who could've thought?
Post Reply

Return to “Cellular Antennas”