Wireless Joint

Anyone knows how to unlock it without getting in touch with Sprint? I got one for testing from ebay and sadly it came locked, seller didn't tell me it was locked.

Thanks!

ruraltx wrote: Tue Mar 01, 2022 11:53 am I used TPWS for anti-DPI:
https://github.com/bol-van/zapret
It's easy to build it for different platforms like routers and Android, so you can set it up however you like.

any video tutorial available it'll be nice.

Thanks

I was reading recently about DPI and someone manage to bypass the restriction using something like VDS, I couldn't read more because it was in Russian and google translate messed up the translation...

Hi everyone, the question us simple, however the answer may not be...

I just want to know which one you all think gets the better signal(LTE) overall between a cellphone and a tablet(android OS).

Thanks!

I did some magic, and now my sierra wireless has an Ipad IMEI and also changed the TTL to 90, this seems to work pretty well too.


just wanted to share the info so anyone can test and report back

Hi everyone

this is the deal, I have WG1608 which a friend of mine bought here, but he got tired of fighting with it trying to get 5ghz and 2.4ghz working at the same time, we both try using GoldenOrb Firmwares and The Wireless Haven too, flashing back and forth all kind of firmware, going from ...

@dairyman

I got 2.4GHz and 5GHz working on the WG1608/WG3526 running the OpenWRT 19.07 Snapshot with the help of LGA1150 on the OpenWRT forum. I installed the snapshot over the top of the WG1608-GO2020-06-14 firmware, but that wiped out the Modem section in the GUI. What was needed was to use the ...

I´m getting an error with this command AT+QENG="neighbourcell" and I´m using a Sierra Wireless EM7665, please confirm if this command is valid for my modem.


Thanks

I fixed this problem by doing a Modem Firmware update using the sierra wireless support page.

Hi everyone,

is there a way to know when my modem is connected to an LTE+ tower or using LTE+, or do I have to assume that if the modem is showing carrier aggregation then is using LTE+.

Thanks

I still have this problem, I'm using Firefox right now.

Although the command AT1LTECA? is showing me some error messages, today the modem worked fine.

If I run AT!GSTATUS I can see my modem is showing 2 bands available, but why if I run AT!LTECA? I now get this error, like if CA is not event present anymore in my MODEM.

Thanks.

this is how I did it:

1. Command: AT!ENTERCND="A710"

2. here I want to which image is the modem using: Command: AT!IMPREF?
AT!IMPREF?
!IMPREF:
preferred fw version: 01.08.04.00
preferred carrier name: SIERRA
preferred config name: SIERRA_002.001_000
current fw version: 01.08.04.00
current ...

Hi everyone, there is something I'm doing wrong, I used TTL 65 with almost every company down here where I live, however there is just one company that this trick doesn't work(Digicel), I have tested almost every number from 60 up to 119 and they still know I'm tethering.

With the other 3 companies ...

I have been reading here and there about TTL, but what other setting, configuration and more we need to consider in order to hide successfully our data consumption from the hotspot monthly allotment.

if there is a list that can be shared it'll be awesome.


thanks,

Anyone knows why i'm getting this now?
I used to be able see all the configurations available for CA.

Thanks.

To risk getting the FCC hammer on your person and business.

The real reason it's risked? To use a cellular service with an LTE Gateway router, meant to only be used on a cell phone or tablet. It further hides the real device and masquerades as the cell plans intended device.

The big bro depts ...

I am sorry but could you please be more specific since it sounds a bit ambiguous to me. So it can be either a or b (or both)

a) you don't know other way how to check if CA is used;

b) no matter what you do CA only works in very particular situations ( extremely good signal etc) and you wonder ...

Hummm.

Are you moving an IMEI number from your phone to a modem?

OR

If not, what are you changing your IMEI number to .... a random number??

Short answer is no benefit .... only risk of bricking your phone and maybe your modem!!


I own a broken Mate 10 Huawei, so I thought I could use the ...

I don't want to know if can be done and/or how is done, what I really want to discuss here if there is a real benefit of changing IMEI of a modem.

Can someone who have done it before share his experience?

Thanks.

Thanks for the answers :-) Actually I came to the same conclusion, the tower simply does not support B2,B4 aggregation although it has no problem with using them individually.
At some point I noticed that when the band lock is not set then my MC7455 can have CA enabled for B7 (20Mhz)+B7(20Mhz ...

Your Note 8 has a category 16 4x4 MIMO 4xCA 256QAM modem in it, and the phones quad antennas are amped and tuned. The EM7565 is 2x2 MIMO with 3xCA and is using cheap spike antennas. Your comparing very different hardware.

According to your signal stats you have lots of noise on your signal ...

I found today that my cellphone has better reception than this card, I was able to get CA working but the signal quality has to be very, very good.

I own a Galaxy Note 8, and using this command *#0011# I can see my cellphone can get CA with B2 and B28, and if I move a few steps to a park near where I live, I can get LTE+ with CA B4 and B28, all this using my cellphone. However my router is a WE826-T2 and it only sees every bands here(2, 4 & 28 ...

I own a Galaxy Note 8, and using this command *#0011# I can see my cellphone can get CA with B2 and B28, and if I move a few steps to a park near where I live, I can get LTE+ with CA B4 and B28, all this using my cellphone. However my router is a WE826-T2 and it only sees every bands here(2, 4 & 28 ...

What you're going to find is that Golden Orb ("GO") and therefore The Wireless Haven firmware based on it are much more user friendly firmware(s) that has many things self-configured and therefore you don't need a degree is rocket science to utilize it, and the opposite end of the spectrum is the ...

I have Sierra Wireless 7565 and I have not been able to get a CA with these 2 bands, Band 4 and 28; 4A_28A:4A,28A look like the device is capable

Hi everyone,

I recently bought a U.FL IPX IPEX MHF4 cable from amazon(ASIN B0894CWLZN), I couldn’t find one here for my wireless sierra EM7565, the one I got doesn’t fit in my MODEM ports, can someone point me to the right one please, and thanks.

which of all the options available in the market you all think will performe well for these 2 bands? B2 and B4.

I'm currently getting RSRQ of 12db ~ 15db for both and RSRP of 95, SINR around 0 ~ -17

Thanks.

I have a WE826-T2 router, currently with a Sierra Wireless 7565 Modem, I'm trying to find what is the difference between these 2 firmware, I understand that they are basically OpenWRT mods made for our router, but which one is better for my router?

Thanks.

Didneywhorl wrote: Fri Nov 20, 2020 2:04 pm Nope, but it can do 2 and 28

or 2, 4, and 29 but thats no help i guess.

Here is the spec for the 7565 attached

Thanks.

Hello everyone, I'm new here, and I just want to know if this MODEM can do Carrier Agreggation with all these three bands, I'm not in the U.S. and where I'm at, these are the only three bands available and I just want to take the best of my investment.



Thanks.